Updates

Latest Updates and News

Deer-01

Call for Indigenous Advisory and Monitoring Committee Indigenous Caucus Members (for a term beginning April 1, 2025)

The Indigenous Caucus is comprised of the Indigenous members of the Indigenous Advisory and Monitoring Committee (the “Committee” or “IAMC”) for the Trans Mountain Pipelines and Marine Shipping (“TMX”). The IAMC was intended to operate for the life of the TMX project. Federal funding for the IAMC has been secured until March 31, 2027.

The current Indigenous Caucus’ mandate will expire on March 31, 2025. The communities affected by TMX will have the opportunity to select a representative for the Indigenous Caucus member for the next term: April 1, 2025 – March 31, 2027. The Indigenous Communities are invited to participate in the upcoming process for the selection of Indigenous Caucus members.

The 13-member Indigenous Caucus includes representatives from:

  1. Alberta First Nations (3 representatives)
  2. Alberta Métis (1 representative)
  3. BC Interior (1 representative)
  4. BC Métis (1 representative)
  5. Burrard Inlet/Lower Fraser (1 representative)
  6. Fraser Valley (1 representative)
  7. Mid-Fraser/Thompson (1 representative)
  8. Okanagan (1 representative)
  9. Vancouver Island – South (1 representative)
  10. Vancouver Island – Southeast (1 representative)
  11. Vancouver Island – Western Approach (1 representative)

Background on the Committee

The Committee was established in 2017.1 The Committee brings together six senior representatives from federal government departments and regulators who are involved in the TMX Project,2 and thirteen Indigenous representatives, selected from among the 129 potentially impacted communities along the Trans Mountain Expansion pipeline corridor and marine shipping lanes, to provide advice to regulators and to monitor the Trans Mountain Expansion.

Committee Members have a shared goal of safety and protection of environmental and Indigenous interests in the lands and water. The Committee’s activities center on advice and

monitoring on the safety, environmental and socio-economic aspects of the existing and proposed pipeline and associated marine shipping. The Committee is also working to seek regulatory change, arising from their experience in the IAMC-TMX project.

The Role of Indigenous Caucus

A key component of the Committee is the thirteen-member Indigenous Caucus, which works to bring issues of concern from Indigenous communities to the work of the Committee. The structure of the Committee, on which the Indigenous Caucus comprises a majority of members, allows Indigenous Caucus to play a deciding role in setting the agenda and priorities of the Committee.

The Committee meets at least quarterly, and more frequently as agreed to by the Committee. The Committee has several subcommittees and working groups to support its work, including Indigenous Monitoring, Marine Shipping, Socioeconomic and Emergency Management. Indigenous Caucus members sit on these subcommittees and working groups.

The time commitment for Indigenous Caucus members can vary, depending on what responsibilities Indigenous Caucus members take on. Some Indigenous Caucus members dedicate the majority of their time to Caucus work, whereas others contribute their valuable insights through participation in more targeted projects and initiatives.

It is important that Indigenous Caucus Members have sufficient time and ability to participate in Committee meetings and in sub-committee work, and that Indigenous communities trust the Indigenous representatives of their region to advance their interests and perspectives. Indigenous Caucus members are compensated for their participation in the IAMC through honoraria and travel expenses covered by the Caucus.

Proposed Selection Process

The Committee’s Terms of Reference (“TOR”) require that Indigenous Caucus develop methods for the selection of members of the Caucus and that it initiates a process for Indigenous Communities to determine how members of the Caucus will be selected, and the terms for those Caucus members going forward.

JFK Law Corporation will administer the selection process of Indigenous Caucus members.

We wish to facilitate a transparent and flexible selection process that can be tailored for each region, to allow each region to select members in a manner that suits that region.

Selection by Consensus

If a region is able to select a representative by consensus, then this approach may be pursued. A consensus, for instance, may be a Tribal Council Resolution, a signed letter of support from elected Chiefs of a majority of Indigenous communities in the region, or another approach that reaches consensus. If your region is able to select a representative by consensus before the end of the nomination period, then the name of the representative and supporting material demonstrating consensus should be communicated to Maya Ollek by email at mollek@jfklaw.ca as early as possible and by no later than 10:59pm PST/11:59pm MT on March 3, 2025.

Nominations

JFK will receive nominations for the position of Caucus member for your region up to 10:59 pm PST/11:59 pm MST on March 3, 2025. Nominations must be sent by email to Maya Ollek by email at mollek@jfklaw.ca. Nominations must include the candidate’s name, First Nation, and a brief statement of interest. Candidates may nominate themselves.

Next steps

If more than one nomination is received by March 3, 2025, or if no consensus is reached for a regional representative before that date, JFK Law will reach out to each region regarding next steps to evaluate what other selection processes may be followed, up to and including an election. If a further selection process is required, each community will be entitled to one regional representative selection vote

If you have any questions, please contact JFK Law (Maya Ollek) by email at mollek@jfklaw.ca or by phone at 778-819-3853.

  1. More information about the Committee is available on its website (Home – IAMC-TMX) and the Terms of Reference (IAMC-TMX TERMS OF REFERENCE, AMENDED SEPTEMBER 2021 – IAMC-TMX). ↩︎
  2. Natural Resources Canada; Canada Energy Regulator; Transport Canada; Fisheries and Ocean Canada; the Canadian Coast Guard; and Environment and Climate Change Canada ↩︎

IAMC-TMX

Facebook

Community of Practice, March 2025 A Hopeful Future: Indigenous Impact Assessment “There’s something to be said about Indigenous site selection; what’s good on the land and what isn’t”. While sharing his presentation on Indigenous Impact Assessment, Martin Whitney explored many challenges and opportunities. An overreliance on proponent-led impact assessments enables government and industry to “shop around” for preferred third-party assessments, leading to pre-determination and failing to adequately consider Indigenous interests. “That’s a dangerous place to be: praising a proponent with a limited or incomplete picture or understanding of the data of these issues.” Martin also described the government’s tendency to homogenize its approach. “Indigenous can be too broad. Too ‘pan’. We need to see a Stó꞉lō impact assessment. A Secwépemc impact assessment. These will be very specific to their communities and lands.”

4

Community of Practice, March 2025 National Indigenous Monitors Framework Kristina Zoller shared updates from the Canada Energy Regulator’s ongoing efforts to develop a National Indigenous Monitors Framework. This work will help increase regulatory transparency and communications and increase confidence for Indigenous communities. Richard Aisaican, the Indigenous co-chair for Line 3 IAMC, spoke of the importance of this work: “We are only allowed on the land to perform monitoring and compliance activities under the umbrella of the CER. We talk to municipalities, but they don’t really want us there. This framework can tighten up questions of Métis involvement, deviations, private land ownership issues, and more. It’s important work.” Participants raised the challenge of how the CER’s purview doesn’t extend to the marine space. Kristina expressed an openness to working in collaboration with marine Indigenous communities and other regulators, such as the DFO. “We don’t need to continue on with these silos for the sake of ease of administration.” -Kristina Zoller

1
1 Comments

Community of Practice, March 2025 Thinking Tómiyew Would our ancestors 7 generations ago have considered the decisions we’re making today as honourable and good? Will our descendants 7 generations from now approve? Keith Carlson, Professor of History from the University of the Fraser Valley posed these questions during his illuminating presentation on the history of colonialism in Canada. We covered topics such as manifest destiny, privilege, whiteness, and the racist canards used to justify and advance settler colonialism. What made Dr. Carlson’s presentation unique was the principle that “meaning precedes experience.” In other words, it is vital to examine history from Indigenous cultural framings rather than only from the dominant Western perspective. In discussion, Indigenous leaders in the room were able to relate historical colonial practices to ongoing challenges they experience today.

4
2 Comments

Community of Practice, March 2025 Salish Fire Keepers Leona Antoine taught us about the work of the Salish Fire Keepers Society. Cultural burning brings traditional knowledge into practice, supporting land stewardship, food security, and cultural revitalization efforts. By applying the teachings of the Four Food Chiefs- Salmon, Bear, Bitterroot, and Saskatoon- along with other traditional knowledge, Leona and the Salish Fire Keepers are enhancing Indigenous values while protecting the land. Chief Marcel Shackelly pointed out how cultural burning can be effective in wildfire prevention and soil retention practices, showing how we can connect these ideas to the work of Indigenous monitoring and emergency management. “The Huckleberry Women and Grizzly Men recognized a lack of fire on the land. Decolonizing requires ceremony and traditional governance.” -Leona Antoine

4

Community of Practice, March 2025 Group Discussions Throughout the day, we broke into smaller groups to discuss the challenges, opportunities, and priorities for Indigenous Monitors today and into the future. We brainstormed practices, resources, and strategies to support and further this work, which is often but one of many responsibilities for monitors in service to their communities. We examined how Indigenous Monitoring will enable the development of Indigenous Regulator Official roles as part of the evolving Regulatory landscape.

1

Community of Practice, March 2025 Evening Reception & Cultural Experiences After getting to know each other over a wonderful dinner, we were welcomed to the Museum of Anthropology by Tsatsu Stalqayu (Coastal Wolf Pack) who taught us about the local lands and history and presented us with a fine performance of cultural singing and dances. Surrounded by Coastal First Nation heraldic poles and carvings, George Desjarlais amazed us in his portable Newayak Kisikohk planetarium. George shared Cree teachings and mythology of the night sky. George uses skillful storytelling and includes adventures and lessons from his personal journey, delivering a truly unique and moving experience. Thank you, George!

2

Community of Practice, March 2025 Lahal & Dancing Thank you to Tommy Brown for teaching us to play Lahal! We had several fun and exciting rounds of this traditional game. Cree Elder Ken White told us of variations on the rules which was a good reminder of the richness that occurs when we share culture embodying both commonality and uniqueness. Next was a cultural dance, which everyone enjoyed, accompanied by Tommy’s beautiful singing and drumming. It was great to wrap up our day of learning together in a good way.

1

Wise Practices Gathering On March 13 & 14, 2025, the IAMC-TMX Socioeconomic Subcommittee (SESC) and Marine Shipping Subcommittee (MSSC) hosted a Wise Practices gathering in lək̓ʷəŋən territory (Songhees and Esquimalt First Nations). Wise Practices is an approach to change that understands the need to look back in order to move forward in a good way, recognizing the wisdom of Indigenous Nations and communities and their own stories of achieving success. The recent Wise Practices gathering was an opportunity to focus much-needed attention on the perspective of marine communities regarding the safety and security of Indigenous Women, Girls and Gender Diverse and Two-Spirit people in the context of TMX and other marine traffic. The event, attended by First Nation leaders, Elders and advocates, provided opportunities to learn about the work of the Circle on MMIWG2S+ and Resource Development, and to hear directly from communities regarding their concerns in the marine space. The event included a sharing circle and various cultural ceremonies, including to honour those who remain missing but are not forgotten. The SESC and MSSC understand that more needs to be done to identify and address systemic race- and gender-based violence linked to resource development. At the forefront of the Wise Practices gathering in lək̓ʷəŋən territory is the development and implementation of a plan related to Canada’s commitment to the five Calls for Justice focused on the resource sector (13.1-13.5), as identified in the United Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Action Plan (2023). This work will involve deepening an understanding of issues associated with human and sex trafficking in the marine space and strengthening collaboration with NRCan and relevant regulators. We sincerely thank all participants who joined us earlier this month and look forward to continuing to advance this work together moving forward.

5

Community of Practice, March 2025 Decolonizing Master Guardian Designation Charlene Everson, Cultural Capacity Coordinator for Na̱nwaḵolas Council, shared with us her work developing a new and unique stewardship designation. Working with community knowledge keepers, Charlene studies and applies traditional laws and values as a lens to craft the technical, regulatory, and environmental frameworks of Na̲nwak̲olas’ guardianship efforts. Their precise focus on Kwakwa̱ka̱ʼwakw culture yields specific and distinct guardianship approaches, tailored to meet the needs of Na̱nwaḵolas’ member nations. “We’re building beautiful relationships with the federal government. It’s not easy. Sometimes it’s very hard. But we’re doing it. Nobody is going to come up with an Indigenous research framework but us. Our ways. Our laws. ” -Charlene Everson

3

Newsletter Subscription

If you would like to receive email notifications of the latest IAMC-TMX news updates, please sign up to our subscription service.