Updates

Latest Updates and News

Deer-01

Acknowledgement of systemic racism helps demonstrate energy regulator’s commitment to reconciliation

This Op-Ed by @IAMC_TMX Co-Chair and Indigenous Caucus Chair Michelle Wilsdon was published in @TheHillTimes on March 17, 2021


The Canada Energy Regulator’s acknowledgment, however, would have rung hollow if it were not taking parallel action to change its operations.

Michelle Wilsdon

The Canada Energy Regulator recently acknowledged systemic racism within the organization, and committed itself to systemic change. On behalf of Indigenous representatives who work closely with the Canada Energy Regulator in the oversight of the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion (TMX), we applaud the Canada Energy Regulator for its leadership.

In 2016, when the federal government approved the TMX for the first time, it committed to co-developing an Indigenous Advisory and Monitoring Committee with Indigenous communities affected by the TMX. The government did so in response to strong and compelling demands by Indigenous leaders that, if the project was approved, then Indigenous people from the affected communities should be on the ground monitoring the construction and operations and at the table with the regulators, all with the aim of reducing the project’s impacts on the environmental and their Aboriginal and Treaty rights.

Indigenous leaders made these demands because for too long we have been shut out of the oversight of major industrial projects that harm the lands and waters of our homelands. As a result, we have witnessed, from the sidelines, government regulators prioritize commercial interests over protection of the environment and our rights, and privilege western science over Indigenous knowledge. In particular, the National Energy Board-now the Canada Energy Regulator-was long viewed by many Indigenous people as a “captive regulator” that was strongly aligned with the economic interests of the oil patch and ambivalent toward, if not hostile to, the interests of the Indigenous communities.

The committee, which was established in 2017, only engages on how the TMX can be built more safely, not whether it should be built. On that basis, the committee includes participation from Indigenous communities that take the full spectrum of positions on the TMX: from supporting it to having it challenged in court. The Indigenous members sit together with representatives of six federal departments and the Canada Energy Regulator and advance the committee’s work on a consensus basis.

The committee’s main activities include monitoring the construction of the TMX and the operations of the pipelines and marine shipping, as well as advising government and regulators on the oversight of those activities. The overarching goal, however, is to form the basis of a new relationship between Indigenous communities, the government, and the Canada Energy Regulator in respect of the TMX, the existing pipeline and the associated shipping. Every time the committee co-develops a new piece of work, or makes a collaborative decision, progress is made towards that overarching goal. The more the members of the committee work together, the more we are all able to leverage each other’s expertise to achieve shared goals.

That work challenges us all to listen, to understand, to question our assumptions, to respect cultural difference, and to be courageous in confronting colonial legacies and implicit bias. It is slow, difficult work, but over the last four years, we have seen progress in respect of the federal departments and agencies with whom we work.

The Canada Energy Regulator, for instance, is making strong, consistent efforts to address the trust deficit it once faced. It has embraced reconciliation with Indigenous peoples as a pillar of its work, it has supported the committee from the outset, and it has recently established an overarching Indigenous Advisory Committee to advise it on how to enhance Indigenous inclusion with respect to the infrastructure it regulates. The Canada Energy Regulator rightfully recognizes that transformation must take place in order to make advancements in both infrastructure development and in reconciliation.

The Canada Energy Regulator went even further recently, when its CEO and its chair acknowledged in an interview with the CBC that systemic racism exists within the organization, and that the regulator has in the past operated in a way “that discounted Indigenous people, that saw them as an obstacle, that was adversarial.” Both committed the Canada Energy Regulator to systemic change.

We feel confident in saying that the National Energy Board in 2016 would not have acknowledged systemic racism within its organization. The Canada Energy Regulator’s acknowledgment, however, would have rung hollow if it were not taking parallel action to change its operations. Similarly, the operational actions would have felt superficial if not underpinned by the acknowledgement of persistent systemic racism within the organization and a commitment to systemic change. It is by both acknowledging the facts and taking meaningful action that the Canada Energy Regulator is demonstrating its commitment to effecting systemic change and to forming the kind of new relationship envisioned by the Committee. We encourage all federal departments and agencies to take up their reconciliation work with that same seriousness of purpose.

Michelle Wilsdon the co-chair of the Indigenous Advisory and Monitoring Committee on the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion and Existing Pipeline, and chair of the committee’s Indigenous Caucus. She is from the Enoch Cree Nation, and currently serves her Nation as an elected member of Council.


Original article can be found here: https://www.hilltimes.com/2021/03/17/acknowledgement-of-systemic-racism-helps-demonstrate-energy-regulators-commitment-to-reconciliation/288883

Posted in

IAMC-TMX

Facebook

Honouring the Roots of Indigenous Oversight This National Indigenous History Month, we reflect on the powerful origins of the IAMC-TMX. It began in 2017 with a letter to the Prime Minister — a call from leaders Chief Ernie Crey and Chief Aaron Sumexheltza to create a new model of Indigenous-led oversight. Today, that vision endures through our subcommittees, our Indigenous Monitors, our partnerships with regulators, and our ongoing commitment to protecting lands, waters, and communities. We honour those who stood up, spoke out, and continue to lead the way. Learn more: www.iamc.ca Photo credit: Mary Fowles

7

We’re Making History — Together This National Indigenous History Month, the IAMC proudly celebrates the transformative work of our Indigenous Monitors Program — a program built by Indigenous People, for Indigenous oversight. Since 2019, Indigenous Monitors from communities along the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMX) have been exercising their rights and responsibilities to protect the lands, waters, and sacred places along the route. Our Monitors bring Indigenous knowledge, ceremony, and law to their roles, working towards development done with respect, accountability, and care. The Indigenous Monitoring program is the first of its kind, not only in Canada but also globally. This is not just monitoring. This is Indigenous leadership in action. This is reconciliation in practice. This is history — and we are honoured to be making it together. Photo credits: Mary Fowles and Earl Belcourt

8

Request for Proposal The IAMC-TMX is requesting proposals for conference meeting facilitator services for our Line Wide Gathering 2025. For more information, please visit www.iamc.ca/request-for-proposal-conferenece-meeting-facilitator-services-for-iamc-tmx-line-wide-gathering-2025/.

2

Request for Proposal The IAMC-TMX is seeking proposals for the administration of the selection process for the Alberta Métis representative to the IAMC-TMX Indigenous Caucus. Proposals must be submitted by June 16, 2025. For more information, please visit www.iamc.ca/request-for-proposal-administration-of-the-selection-process-for-the-alberta-metis-representative-to-the-iamc-tmx-indigenous-caucus/

Contract Opportunity: Socioeconomic Program Manager The IAMC-TMX is seeking a dedicated resource to support the work of the Socioeconomic Subcommittee (SESC). This is a contract position. For more information, please visit www.iamc.ca/contract-opportunity-socio-economic-program-manager/

On May 05, also known as Red Dress Day, the IAMC-TMX Socioeconomic Subcommittee calls on all levels of government to enhance their efforts to address ongoing issues regarding Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women, Girls, and 2SLGBTQIA+ people (MMIWG2S). MMIWG2S+ is an ongoing, serious problem in Canada. The IAMC-TMX Socioeconomic Subcommittee is committed to advancing work focused on ending violence against Indigenous women, girls, and 2SLGBTQIA+ people, including through practical collaborations and working in partnership with the governments and other organizations. Today, on Red Dress Day, we encourage Canadians to wear red in remembrance and honour of those who have been wrongfully taken and as a sign of support for the families and communities continuing to seek justice for the loss of their loves ones. Now is a time to deepen learning about MMIWG2S+ and join in advocacy efforts calling for more to be done to ensure justice for families and communities who have lost loved ones, and to work towards a future where everyone can be safe. About Red Dress Day Red Dress Day stems from a project initiated by the Métis artist Jaime Black who hung up red dresses as a way to represent missing and murdered women. Over time, the red dresses have come to be iconic of this very important day.

3

Community of Practice, March 2025 A Hopeful Future: Indigenous Impact Assessment “There’s something to be said about Indigenous site selection; what’s good on the land and what isn’t”. While sharing his presentation on Indigenous Impact Assessment, Martin Whitney explored many challenges and opportunities. An overreliance on proponent-led impact assessments enables government and industry to “shop around” for preferred third-party assessments, leading to pre-determination and failing to adequately consider Indigenous interests. “That’s a dangerous place to be: praising a proponent with a limited or incomplete picture or understanding of the data of these issues.” Martin also described the government’s tendency to homogenize its approach. “Indigenous can be too broad. Too ‘pan’. We need to see a Stó꞉lō impact assessment. A Secwépemc impact assessment. These will be very specific to their communities and lands.”

5

Community of Practice, March 2025 National Indigenous Monitors Framework Kristina Zoller shared updates from the Canada Energy Regulator’s ongoing efforts to develop a National Indigenous Monitors Framework. This work will help increase regulatory transparency and communications and increase confidence for Indigenous communities. Richard Aisaican, the Indigenous co-chair for Line 3 IAMC, spoke of the importance of this work: “We are only allowed on the land to perform monitoring and compliance activities under the umbrella of the CER. We talk to municipalities, but they don’t really want us there. This framework can tighten up questions of Métis involvement, deviations, private land ownership issues, and more. It’s important work.” Participants raised the challenge of how the CER’s purview doesn’t extend to the marine space. Kristina expressed an openness to working in collaboration with marine Indigenous communities and other regulators, such as the DFO. “We don’t need to continue on with these silos for the sake of ease of administration.” -Kristina Zoller

1
1 Comments

Community of Practice, March 2025 Thinking Tómiyew Would our ancestors 7 generations ago have considered the decisions we’re making today as honourable and good? Will our descendants 7 generations from now approve? Keith Carlson, Professor of History from the University of the Fraser Valley posed these questions during his illuminating presentation on the history of colonialism in Canada. We covered topics such as manifest destiny, privilege, whiteness, and the racist canards used to justify and advance settler colonialism. What made Dr. Carlson’s presentation unique was the principle that “meaning precedes experience.” In other words, it is vital to examine history from Indigenous cultural framings rather than only from the dominant Western perspective. In discussion, Indigenous leaders in the room were able to relate historical colonial practices to ongoing challenges they experience today.

4
2 Comments

Newsletter Subscription

If you would like to receive email notifications of the latest IAMC-TMX news updates, please sign up to our subscription service.